What is the Internal Revenue Service's "Dinah Shore Ruling"?
Question #18594. Asked by Maggie.
Last updated Sep 18 2016.
McGruff
Answer has 8 votes
Currently Best Answer
McGruff 24 year member
3694 replies
Answer has 8 votes.
Currently voted the best answer.
This is the term/ruling the U.S. Internal Revenue Service uses to allow a dress to be deducted as a professional expense if it is too tight to sit down in. The ruling was issued after singer, Dinah Shore, deducted gowns worn in public appearances as business expenses and insisted, when challenged by the IRS, that they were only worn onstage while performing.
Sep 14 2001, 8:18 AM
Son of The Household Cavalry
Answer has 3 votes
Son of The Household Cavalry
Answer has 3 votes.
A dress can be deducted as a professional expense if it is too tight to sit down in. The ruling was issued after singer Shore deducted gowns worn in public appearances as business expenses and insisted, when challenged by the IRS, that they were only worn onstage while performing.
Response last updated by Terry on Sep 18 2016.
Apr 26 2002, 8:15 PM
zbeckabee
Answer has 4 votes
zbeckabee Moderator 18 year member
11752 replies
Answer has 4 votes.
Dinah Shore classified several gowns as a business expense. The IRS challenged the expenses, to which Shore responded that the gowns were too tight to sit down in...thus, they could only be worn on stage. In what has become known as the Dinah Shore Ruling, the IRS allowed her to deduct any dress that was too tight to sit down in.
Response last updated by Terry on Sep 18 2016.
Dec 28 2008, 2:02 PM